<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>「WeTalk」的迴響</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw</link>
	<description>台灣相關訊息收集</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 21:01:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>由 John Doe 發表的 外交部到底有沒有說謊？ 迴響</title>
		<link>http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/9661.html/comment-page-1#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 21:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/9661.html#comment-485</guid>
		<description>這篇短文的大意就是外交部說謊，謊稱《開羅宣言》是《國際協定》。那麼，到底是誰在說謊呢？ 我現在將台獨組織上、美國國家檔案局的信件內容貼出來給大家參考，各位可以去以下網址查閱全文：

http://ataa.us/portal111/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=159&amp;Itemid=2
=================================
The only international treaties in our custody are those sent to us from the Department of State with a TS (treaty series), EAS (executive agreement series), or TIAS (treaties and other international agreements series) number.
These documents are all in record Group 11, General Records of the United States Government. As you state in your letter, the declaration was a &quot;communique,&quot; and it does not have treaty series (TS) or executive agreements series (EAS) number.

The &quot;Cairo Declaration&quot; is included in the State Department publication &quot;Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States of America, 1776-1949,&quot; edited by Charles I. Bevans (volume 3, p. 858). The source is given as 1943 For. Rel. (Conferences at Cairo and Tehran) 448. The State Department publication &quot;Foreign Relations of the United States: Conferences at Cairo and Tehran, 1943,&quot; includes on page 448 the text of the communique relating to the meeting at Cairo of President Roosevelt, Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek, and Prime Minister Churchill. 
===================================

的確，開羅宣言是個公報，且並未賦予條約（ＴＳ）系列或行政協定（ＥＡＳ）的編碼，可是從引用的第一段裡我們可以看到，美國文件檔案局除了這兩個編碼，還有TIAS (treaties and other international agreements series) number。在下一段裡，檔案局的官員承認開羅宣言確實收錄在Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States of America。開羅宣言確實是一項國際協定（international agreement)，為什麼自由時報只選擇性地把檔案管理局的第一段話告訴讀者，不把全文告訴讀者呢？</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>這篇短文的大意就是外交部說謊，謊稱《開羅宣言》是《國際協定》。那麼，到底是誰在說謊呢？ 我現在將台獨組織上、美國國家檔案局的信件內容貼出來給大家參考，各位可以去以下網址查閱全文：</p>
<p><a href="http://ataa.us/portal111/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=159&#038;Itemid=2" rel="nofollow">http://ataa.us/portal111/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=159&#038;Itemid=2</a><br />
=================================<br />
The only international treaties in our custody are those sent to us from the Department of State with a TS (treaty series), EAS (executive agreement series), or TIAS (treaties and other international agreements series) number.<br />
These documents are all in record Group 11, General Records of the United States Government. As you state in your letter, the declaration was a "communique," and it does not have treaty series (TS) or executive agreements series (EAS) number.</p>
<p>The "Cairo Declaration" is included in the State Department publication "Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States of America, 1776-1949," edited by Charles I. Bevans (volume 3, p. 858). The source is given as 1943 For. Rel. (Conferences at Cairo and Tehran) 448. The State Department publication "Foreign Relations of the United States: Conferences at Cairo and Tehran, 1943," includes on page 448 the text of the communique relating to the meeting at Cairo of President Roosevelt, Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek, and Prime Minister Churchill.<br />
===================================</p>
<p>的確，開羅宣言是個公報，且並未賦予條約（ＴＳ）系列或行政協定（ＥＡＳ）的編碼，可是從引用的第一段裡我們可以看到，美國文件檔案局除了這兩個編碼，還有TIAS (treaties and other international agreements series) number。在下一段裡，檔案局的官員承認開羅宣言確實收錄在Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States of America。開羅宣言確實是一項國際協定（international agreement)，為什麼自由時報只選擇性地把檔案管理局的第一段話告訴讀者，不把全文告訴讀者呢？</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>由 台灣本地遊 -網誌熱搜"台灣本地遊" 發表的 台灣與德國 牛奶加汽水 迴響</title>
		<link>http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/9243.html/comment-page-1#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>台灣本地遊 -網誌熱搜"台灣本地遊"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/9243.html#comment-470</guid>
		<description>[...] 台灣與德國牛奶加汽水&#124; WeTalk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 台灣與德國牛奶加汽水| WeTalk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>由 土爪灣工聯會 -網誌熱搜"土爪灣工聯會" 發表的 南山案 投審會：審查時間未定 迴響</title>
		<link>http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/9215.html/comment-page-1#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>土爪灣工聯會 -網誌熱搜"土爪灣工聯會"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/9215.html#comment-469</guid>
		<description>[...] 南山案投審會：審查時間未定&#124; WeTalk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 南山案投審會：審查時間未定| WeTalk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>由 八十後 英文 -網誌熱搜"八十後 英文" 發表的 事關國家命脈 馬英九在選前應作出重大承諾 迴響</title>
		<link>http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/9449.html/comment-page-1#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>八十後 英文 -網誌熱搜"八十後 英文"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/9449.html#comment-468</guid>
		<description>[...] 事關國家命脈馬英九在選前應作出重大承諾&#124; WeTalk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 事關國家命脈馬英九在選前應作出重大承諾| WeTalk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>由 牽一髮動全身 -網誌熱搜"牽一髮動全身" 發表的 在商言商 講政治 迴響</title>
		<link>http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/9459.html/comment-page-1#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>牽一髮動全身 -網誌熱搜"牽一髮動全身"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wetalk.blogger.idv.tw/9459.html#comment-467</guid>
		<description>[...] 在商言商講政治&#124; WeTalk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 在商言商講政治| WeTalk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

